Testing Your AI Playbook

July 16, 2026
Electra Japonas

Don’t worry if your playbook doesn’t perform perfectly the first time you run it - that’s part of the process. Your job at this stage is to see how well the AI understands your rules in practice. Run the playbook against a sample agreement, review the results, and note where the AI flags issues correctly versus where it misses or over-flags. We will then make small adjustments to the rule language to sharpen accuracy. Usually, after one or two test cycles, your playbook will be performing at a high level of precision and ready for wider use.

Step 1: Run the playbook against a sample agreement

  • Choose one or more representative agreements for the playbook type (e.g., for an NDA playbook, test both a mutual and a unilateral NDA).
  • Upload the document into the AI Review tool and select the playbook you want to test.
  • Run the review to see how the AI applies your rules in real time.

Tip: Use clean, well-formatted agreements first. Formatting inconsistencies or OCR errors can distort results and make troubleshooting harder.

Step 2: Check whether the AI correctly identifies compliant/non-compliant language

  • Review each clause the AI has analyzed and confirm whether its classification is correct:

    • Compliant: Clause satisfies the rule as written.
    • ⚠️ Non-compliant: Clause triggers the rule and needs a redline.
    • Missed: Clause should have been flagged but wasn’t.

  • Instead of using a results sheet, it’s often easier to mark up the same agreement you’re testing. Add in-line comments where the AI has over- or under-flagged and note briefly what should have happened.
  • Focus your comments on patterns rather than one-off errors—this will help you refine the underlying rule more efficiently in the next iteration.

Goal: to confirm that the AI is interpreting your rules as intended and identifying compliance accurately in context.

Step 3: Review flagged issues—are they helpful or too broad?

  • Evaluate each flagged issue for precision and usefulness:
    • Does the flag pinpoint the exact compliance gap?
    • Or does it produce a vague comment that adds noise rather than clarity?

  • Identify patterns:
    • Too broad: The AI is triggering the rule in irrelevant contexts → tighten the conditions or rephrase the rule more specifically.
    • Too narrow: The AI is missing relevant cases → expand the trigger terms or simplify the instruction.

  • Ask yourself: Would this feedback help a human reviewer make a faster or better decision?

Step 4: Adjust prompts if the AI is over- or under-flagging

Once you’ve reviewed the results, you can either:

  • Make adjustments yourself directly within the playbook, or
  • Share your marked-up agreement or notes with our team, and we’ll refine the rules for you.

If you choose to edit the rules directly:

  • For over-flagging, narrow the scope by:
    • Removing broad qualifiers like “any” or “all.”
    • Adding context to limit when the rule applies (e.g., “only if missing from the confidentiality clause”).

  • For under-flagging, increase precision by:
    • Including examples of target language or known risk triggers.
    • Rewording abstract rules into concrete instructions (e.g., “Ensure the clause caps liability at 12 months’ fees”).

Re-test after each adjustment or round of feedback. Most playbooks reach strong, reliable accuracy after one or two short iterations.

Optional Step 5: Benchmark against additional agreements

Once initial results look solid, test across 3–5 contracts from different sources or counterparties. This reveals whether your rules generalize across drafting styles and templates.

Objective: a playbook that performs consistently and accurately—regardless of author, format, or jurisdiction.

Wrapping Up

Once your playbook has been tested and refined, it’s ready for real-world use. You’ve now built a reliable framework the AI can apply consistently across agreements—reducing manual review time and ensuring key risks are never missed. Remember, your playbook isn’t static; as your contracting positions evolve, you can revisit and update rules at any time. But for now, you should have a calibrated, high-performing playbook ready to roll out across your contracts with confidence.

See SimpleDocs in Action

Book a free demo to see how SimpleDocs can help your team

Continue reading

Legal AI Strategy
July 20, 2026

The Reorganization of What Lawyers Do All Day

by
Electra Japonas
Legal AI Strategy
July 16, 2026

How to Fund Legal AI Without Promising to Fire People

by
Electra Japonas
Product & Platform
July 17, 2026

The Case for Giving Legal AI a Memory: What SimpleDocs Shipped in April

by
Electra Japonas